December 8, 2013
Reflection on Lectoring
In our recent annual lector meeting a deacon in our parish offered
us an important insight into our ministry.
He said the proclamation of the Scriptures is not meant to be an
exercise in exegesis, interpretation or instruction. Rather, the job of the lector is “to make the
Word of God come alive” for our hearers at Mass.
We shalll spend this week and next thinking about what he
said. This week: a brief explanation of
exegesis and why it is not the goal of the lector ministry.
Dei
Verbum, (Word of God) is one of the documents of Vatican II,
and one of the resources our deacon recommended to us. In section 12, the document makes a
distinction between two types of exegesis: an historical and literary approach
to exegesis, and a theological exegesis.
Both are valuable. Both deepen
our understanding of the Scriptures. Both
employ different methods and norms.
Historical and literary exegesis seeks to understand what
the human writers of the Bible wanted to say.
To do this, it employs technical analysis that includes textual
criticism, source criticism, form criticism, and a few others. According to Dei Verbum, “Attention must be paid to the customary and
characteristic styles of perceiving, speaking and narrating that prevailed at
the time.” Much of the background
materials provided by Scripture commentaries help us understand how the culture
and forms of expression of Old and New Testament writers influenced their
choice of actual words and the analogies which they drew.
Theological exegesis is the other way of finding
authentic meaning in the Scriptures. In
his essay, Vatican II on the
Interpretation of Scripture, Avery Cardinal Dulles demonstrates how Dei Verbum also stresses the need to
understand what God, the divine author, intended to say. Deepening our understanding of what God is
saying is the focus of theological exegesis, an approach that is guided by the
Church and follows a set of norms for determining the authenticity of
interpretation (Catholic tradition and a recognition that the entire Bible is
inspired by God are among those norms).
Proclaimers of the Word and hearers of the Word can both benefit
from a knowledge of how the Scriptures came to be. But as lectors know, they cannot in their two
or three minutes at the ambo provide this kind of background or exegesis. At times, they might even feel a sense of
frustration that they cannot. But that
is not their job. As our deacon said,
their job is to make the Word of God “come alive.”
_________________________
First Reading - Isaiah 11:1-10
Waiting for the Good King
Who is this “he” whom Isaiah is talking about in today’s
first reading?
He seems to be saying that something good is going to “sprout from the stump of Jesse.” He is obviously expecting a lot from a stump.
Prophets like Isaiah have a knack for recognizing all the
bad behavior going on around them. These
same prophets can go on for pages describing the truly horrible outcomes
resulting from this bad behavior. Nevertheless,
they can also see the good that comes from following God’s commandments.
Isaiah did not know that Jesus would arrive on earth
centuries later. But he did know that
Jesse was king David’s father and God had promised David his dynasty would endure. Finally, he knew the difference between a bad
king (like Ahaz) and a good king who will have “the spirit of the Lord” resting on him.
_____________________________
Second Reading - Romans 15:4-9
Harmony in Diversity
No matter the undertaking, no matter the goal you set out
to achieve, you have to take into account the different personalities and
agendas you will encounter.
In his Letter to the Romans, Paul tells the Roman Christian
community about his plans to bring to Jerusalem the money he collected for the
city’s impoverished Jewish Christians.
He then plans to visit Rome personally before moving on to Spain.
Despite his good intentions, he gets arrested in Jerusalem
and spends two years in jail.
Ultimately, he is taken to Rome as a prisoner and is put under house
arrest. There he was martyred even before
getting to Spain.
Today’s second reading extols the value of thinking “in harmony with one another.” In this passage, Paul prays that his readers,
despite their differences, “may with one
voice glorify the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ.”
© George Fournier 2013